Stockholm Syndrome |
Rhinoceros, Eugene Ionesco’s masterpiece
about people’s reaction to group pressure and their supposedly strange behavior,
is formidable (but not pompous) play which is still up-to-date. Joe Penhall’s
review of the play is quite thorough and contains many interesting
observations.
As it was mentioned several times on this blog, the play itself
is full of hopeless interactions between people, the feeling of futility of
being and the absurdity of life. Because of this, Penhall compares Rhinoceros
to The Plague written by A. Camus, claiming that they are both based on
the existentialism. Interestingly, both Camus and Ionesco were against the
‘existentialist’ label and preferred their works to be called absurdist.
Nonetheless, it cannot be doubted that the ideas of existentialism appear in
their plays more than often. Finally, absurdity is part of existentialism and
they cannot be clearly separated in this context.
In his review, Penhall
mentions the Stockholm syndrome, a psychological phenomenon in which the
captors are admired by their hostages and the hostages cooperate with them and
accept their views and positions. This idea is brilliant in the association
with the play. Even though they were the evil creatures at the beginning,
everybody finally accepts the rhinos and joins them, which is a nice
manifestation of such syndrome. It is somewhat natural, because ‘most children
know that the smart thing is to side with the biggest, baddest bully in the
playground’ (Penhall).
Concerning the relevance of the play, it is true that
Ionesco stays quite general, so as to emphasize that the theme of his play is
applicable to any society. In the words of the reviewer of this play: “Perhaps Ionesco deliberately eschewed Camus'
specificity and embraced generality in the hope that for all its antic lack of
sophistication, bluster, bustle and loquaciousness, Rhinoceros would remain
contemporary and universal.”
REVIEW:
Penhall, Joe. "Ionesco's Rhinoceros
is as relevant as ever."Guardian. (2007). Web. 21 Mar.
2012.
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/stage/theatreblog/2007/oct/03/ionescosrhinocerosisasrele>.
Just to be clear -- do you agree that Ionesco has successfully written something that is and will "remain contemporary and universal"?
ReplyDeleteYes, I do agree. I was just too lazy to put it in my own words, so I just used the quotation =)
ReplyDelete